From: Bill Huffman Subject: Re: WHO CARES??? Date: Sunday, November 07, 1999 7:30 PM Patrick Muller wrote in message news:382615B7.1F140080@fenomedia.nl... ... > The infuriating part of this whole issue is being ignored; the fact that posts > like Trainman's (with or without the KKK reference) are a sign of how > out-of-control this whole Derek bashing has become. I blame Bill Huffman personaly Patrick, try as you might there's no way you can blame me for Derek's fraud nor for Derek's forgery nor for any of the other problems that Derek has got himself into. If the man wasn't so addicted to his own lies he could lay it all to rest in just moments by just telling the truth and continue to only tell the truth. Instead he chooses to lie and lie and lie and lie. You really must be a drunken fool to think that it is my fault that Derek is such a fraud and liar. Do I somehow manipulate Derek's posts so that these lies keep creeping in? Like you believe someone did to the Trainman50 forgery? > for making this whole thing fashionable and even encouraging others (the Louis > incident is just a minor example) and basically inviting every moron with some > spare time to take a swing at Derek Smart. I would much rather see it fashionable to bash PhD frauds than to see Derek turning PhD fraud into a fashion trend. Patrick, you are defending a fraud's right to lie. How can you do that? He has a right to make posts but, no one has the right to lie and have their lies be immune to ridicule. When Derek becomes king of the world for real instead of just in his own mind then I will stop. >I can completely live with the fact > that people find him unpleasant etc.. But I look with disgust to people who go > after someone and justify their actions with a bullshit story about ethics and > morals and what not. Patrick thinks that people should have their lies protected from ridicule? Patrick, you are such an ethically blind example of the three monkeys that it is unbelieveable. >And then to see them show the must ugly side of man on a > daily basis with that moral card in their backpocket, so they can flip it out as > some kind of free-card to bash, harass, discredit and stalk when someone questions > their actions. Patrick thinks that lies should be immune to ridicule. Patrick thinks that obnoxious arrogance should be immune to ridicule. Yet he bashes the detractors for being obnoxious, yet he ridicules others almost everyday. Why do you think that Derek's lies, fraud and forgery should be immune to ridicule? Just because he is a game developer? > Please speak your mind about The Ph.D., Derek is a proven fraud. >The game, the deadlines, the flaming of > customers etc. etc.. and let's go at each other over that. But this harassment has > got to stop. Huh? I thought you said we could discuss the PhD fraud? Are you taking back your permission already? > As long as the detractors keep spewing unsubstantiated bs, I won't > take anything they say seriously. Patrick, the three monkeys incarnate, claims that he refuses to access or read the substantiated proofs, then he comes here and claims that there isn't any substantiation. see http://www.access1.net/huffman for proof that Derek Smart is a fraud and for proof that Derek Smart forged racist email. -- Bill Huffman huffman@FRAUDaccess1.net remove the FRAUD to email me